by Scott Martindale
CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC
Quick note 1: Sabrient’s quarterly Dividend 58 portfolio launched today 11/2 with a diverse mix of 41 stocks across sectors and market caps. It employs a Growth & Income strategy with bond-like yield (current yield upon launch of 3.33%) while seeking capital appreciation from high-quality companies. Also, our Q3 2026 Baker’s Dozen portfolio (13 top growth picks) launched on 10/20. Our Q3 2025 Baker’s Dozen just terminated on 10/20 with a gross total return of +33% vs. +24% for SPY. And our quarterly Small Cap Growth 52 portfolio launched on 9/15, with a mix of 44 small-cap stocks. It followed the launch of Sabrient’s annual Forward Looking Value 14 portfolio on 8/26, having a diverse mix of 31 stocks. Last year’s FLV 13 terminates on 11/17 and is currently up +42% vs. +21% for S&P 500 Value (SPYV) and +19 for S&P 500 (SPY) as of 10/30.
Quick note 2: I was recently a guest on the “Biz Wiz” podcast to tell my humble career story from engineering school to the oil industry to investment research and eventually CEO of Sabrient Systems. Key takeaway from the 30-minute discussion is that an entrepreneurial mindset means adaptability, resilience, focusing on high-potential projects, avoiding rabbit holes, responding to customer needs, creating and scaling value, and advocating for yourself and your ideas. I’d love to hear your impressions!
Overview:
Well, in case you thought you largely missed out on the AI trade, the market has given you another entry point. Sure, the sharp Technology selloff was amplified by technical selling, profit-taking, stop-loss orders, and leveraged algo traders temporarily switching to shorts. But I suspect investor anxiety about the approaching midterm elections also played a role. A potential “blue wave” raises the prospect of renewed efforts to roll back the OBBBA's tax reforms, deregulation, and shrinkage of government, along with greater regulatory scrutiny and possible restrictions on AI development and the construction of datacenters, natural gas pipelines, and nuclear facilities.
Such policies could impede the massive infrastructure buildout underpinning the investment boom, which has become a major driver of corporate capex, earnings growth, and broader economic activity. Combined with growing investor scrutiny of hyperscaler spending and ROI, the prospect of stiff political obstacles to this transformative secular technology and economic cycle may be adding another layer of uncertainty to a market already concerned about whether the massive “all-in” capital spending on the various acronyms AI/SI/ASI/RSI will generate adequate returns to justify it all. Some commentators estimate that it will take $1 trillion in revenue run-rate by end of 2028 to justify the capital commitments, which leaves little room for a slowdown.
Nevertheless, assuming the October selloff was driven more by technicals and macro worries rather than earnings growth, and assuming the president’s veto power can stave off the wolves if the blue wave happens, optimistic investors now enjoy much better equity valuations, not just on the broad market but on many of the technology leaders and cutting-edge innovators. Moreover, the rapid surge in risk-free rates—that have been squeezing valuations by raising both corporate borrowing costs and the discount rate applied to future cash flows—seems to have weathered a “blowoff top” and cycle peak, as I suggested was underway in my 10/6 post. Regardless, most of the leading corporations seem to be tolerating higher interest rates pretty well.
As a reminder, corporate revenue tends to track nominal GDP growth. So, with real US GDP coming in at 3.4% annualized pace for Q3 2026 and the Atlanta Fed GDPNow model estimating Q4 at 3.7% (as of 11/2), it means nominal GDP growth (including the GDP deflator for Q3 of 2.2%) is 5.6-5.9%, supporting strong revenue growth, which is well above today’s 4.9% 10-year yield. This suggests that economic output and tax revenues are expanding faster than long-term borrowing costs, making debt easier to service while keeping financial conditions stimulative.
I hear the argument that rates are merely normalizing back to pre-GFC/ZIRP levels and that this 0.7% growth-to-yield spread in a highly resilient economy will keep upward pressure on interest rates. But this isn’t your father’s economy, and it certainly doesn’t mean today’s economy can readily absorb a “mean reversion” in interest rates. Today’s hyper-financialized, post-GFC/ZIRP global economy had become so accustomed to assuming lots of debt because rates were so low, which means that rising rates could cripple the many vulnerable debt-addicted businesses, governments (including our own massive federal debt), and a housing market (which is critical for a healthy consumer) stubbornly priced for low mortgage rates and low inventory. And most of this debt is either floating-rate or must keep rolling over through refinance.
In addition, 30-year mortgage rates (reaching as high as 7.4% recently) certainly have been even higher in the past. But home prices today are largely based on that lower baseline of post-GFC easing and ultra-low rates. And given recent strengthening of the US dollar, some emerging market economies with dollar-denominated debt may be forced into default.
In other words, outside of the largest corporations with fortress balance sheets, today’s highly indebted global financial system simply can’t handle the current level of interest rates.
Economist and liquidity expert Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital sees cracks in the veneer of economic strength. He says that while capital markets were traditionally intended to raise new capital for real-world investments, infrastructure, and projects, today the reality is that 70-80% of all global financial transactions are simply rolling over existing debt, effectively turning the global financial system into a massive "refinancing machine."
Furthermore, I do not buy the “persistently elevated inflation” narrative. I believe underlying core inflation is stable and structural disinflationary trends are poised to take control once the energy/supply shocks are resolved. Indeed, I continue to assert that Fed rate hikes are a policy mistake for our bifurcated K-shaped economy (although it is notable that M2 money supply continues to grow at the same decent clip since 2024). We have soaring corporate profits and stock prices juxtaposed with stagnant labor and housing markets, negative real wage growth, a falling personal saving rate, and surging bond credit spreads.
In my comprehensive commentary below, I discuss:
1. The booming IPO market
2. Earnings and valuations
3. Stock valuations and bond yields
4. Jitters over the AI trade
5. Surging credit spreads
6. GDP, industrial production, and productivity
7. Inflation and the K-shaped economy
8. What should the Fed take from this?
9. China’s economy is a growing problem for the world
10. My Final Comments section on the oath of office, crisis in France, and AI fearmongering
11. Sabrient’s sector rankings, positioning of our sector rotation model, and some top-ranked ETF ideas
The combination of high bond yields, surging credit spreads, geopolitical risks, elevated oil prices, ongoing supply shocks, election uncertainty, and jitters about both AI safety and when significant ROI will arrive for the massive AI capex are conspiring to hurt investor confidence and drive down valuation multiples more than recent S&P price action reflects, as overall earnings and guidance continue to march higher. Indeed, a market correction has been underway for months, even though the broad cap-weighted market indexes hasn’t reflected it. While a relatively small group of large stocks kept the S&P 500 near its highs, valuations across much of the market have been declining for months as investors are increasingly rewarding companies with stronger profitability, healthier balance sheets and more dependable earnings while assigning lower valuations to businesses whose prospects are less certain.
The aggregate P/E multiple is down over 20% from its high, and EPS growth is expected to slow substantially next year, albeit from an incredibly (and unsustainably) high level. And credit markets are getting more selective, forcing a quality rotation that includes equities—an internal rotation rather than an abandonment of stocks. So, when I talk about greater market breadth being “healthy” for the market, I’m not talking about equal-weight outperforming cap-weight for an extended period. No, after such periodic periods of cleansing the leverage and speculation, we still need Technology sector leadership, including from Big Tech. But having broader participation across the stock market with more (if not all) “boats” lifted is healthy and desirable for the stock market for many of the same reasons that having broader participation from the lower leg of the K-shaped economy is healthy and desirable for the economy and society.
However, the Fed knows that credit spreads have surged as investors seek either higher quality or greater compensation for elevated risk. But only CCC or worse are in distressed territory. This is yet another sign of the neglected lower-leg of the K-shaped economy being left behind in this AI infrastructure-driven economy, and why I urge the Fed not to hike rates any further—and in fact should cut back toward a 3.0-3.25% fed funds rate (FFR). Look, I understand the argument that today’s rates are simply normalizing to pre-GFC levels. And I am not talking about a return to ZIRP (zero interest rate policy), which created essentially “free money” leading to plenty of malinvestment in unworthy, highly speculative companies, products, and ventures—including non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs).
I just want to see a more broad-based economy (i.e., more boats lifted) in which most if not all industries are participating. Keeping floating-rate debt manageable is a step in that direction. So, I’m thinking that a funds rate of 3.25% at the top end plus an historical average spread of 125 bps for the 10-year Treasury should put 10-year at about 4.5%. This suggests nominal GDP growth (with today’s growth-to-yield spread of 0.7%) of around 5.0-5.2%. With the GDP deflator falling to 2.0%, we would have sustainable real GDP growth at a solid 3.0%.
Overall, I see the US economy as more recession-resistant, more technology-efficient, more services-oriented (meaning less energy-intensive and less at risk of inventory buildup that must be dumped cheaply into the market, like China does), and thus less cyclical. So, a steadier, more predictable economy means structurally higher corporate margins, earnings, cash flow, and capex consistency, which supports higher valuation multiples, lower credit spreads, a subdued VIX, and a buy-the-dip investor mentality. It seems that only a resurgence in bond yields, an AI-related credit crisis, or a harsh political disruption could derail it.
As such, I still think the S&P 500 has a shot at hitting 8,000 by year-end. But it largely depends on the ongoing Q3 earnings reports and forward guidance, which have illuminated some concerns among juggernauts—including Meta (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN) all spending well beyond their monstrous cash generation on their AI buildouts and pushing each company into deep, historically unprecedented negative free cash flow. Expectations are becoming challenging. As the GMO Asset Allocation team observed, “For the first time in twenty years, with the brief exception of the Global Financial Crisis, we are seeing net dilution in the U.S. stock market (i.e., share issuance exceeding share buybacks) as the hyperscalers continue their capital expenditure spree.”
Moreover, I expect a continuation of the market broadening beyond just the AI trade, and I continue to see opportunities in active stock selection, equal-weight indexes, value stocks, cyclical sectors, small caps, and bond-alternative dividend payers. Indeed, Sabrient’s quant-based, actively selected (“quantamental”), equal-weight Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Dividend, and Small Cap Growth portfolios have been largely outperforming their benchmarks—several by substantial margins. And as a reminder, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is licensed as a quality prescreen to the actively managed, low-beta First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS), which now holds more than $2.6 billion in AUM.
Lastly, with a highly consequential election upon us, I hope you vote for policies over personalities, and long-term success and prosperity over short-term band-aids. There are those among us who are blissfully ignorant of and unburdened by our ancestors’ centuries of accumulated wisdom, trial and error, what works and what doesn’t, who think they know better how to maximize the potential and wellbeing of both individuals and society as a whole despite the harsh lessons of history and despite many candidates never having managed a successful enterprise themselves, much less a nation. Worse, many voters simply go for “the other guy” if they aren’t happy with their lives today, no matter how impractical the other guy’s proposed solutions. I have more to say about this in my Final Comments section below.
Here is a link to this full post in printable PDF format. As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event. Read on….
