by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC
 

Quick note 1: Sabrient’s quarterly Dividend 58 portfolio launched today 11/2 with a diverse mix of 41 stocks across sectors and market caps. It employs a Growth & Income strategy with bond-like yield (current yield upon launch of 3.33%) while seeking capital appreciation from high-quality companies. Also, our Q3 2026 Baker’s Dozen portfolio (13 top growth picks) launched on 10/20. Our Q3 2025 Baker’s Dozen just terminated on 10/20 with a gross total return of +33% vs. +24% for SPY. And our quarterly Small Cap Growth 52 portfolio launched on 9/15, with a mix of 44 small-cap stocks. It followed the launch of Sabrient’s annual Forward Looking Value 14 portfolio on 8/26, having a diverse mix of 31 stocks. Last year’s FLV 13 terminates on 11/17 and is currently up +42% vs. +21% for S&P 500 Value (SPYV) and +19 for S&P 500 (SPY) as of 10/30.

Quick note 2: I was recently a guest on the “Biz Wiz” podcast to tell my humble career story from engineering school to the oil industry to investment research and eventually CEO of Sabrient Systems. Key takeaway from the 30-minute discussion is that an entrepreneurial mindset means adaptability, resilience, focusing on high-potential projects, avoiding rabbit holes, responding to customer needs, creating and scaling value, and advocating for yourself and your ideas. I’d love to hear your impressions!

Overview:

Well, in case you thought you largely missed out on the AI trade, the market has given you another entry point. Sure, the sharp Technology selloff was amplified by technical selling, profit-taking, stop-loss orders, and leveraged algo traders temporarily switching to shorts. But I suspect investor anxiety about the approaching midterm elections also played a role. A potential “blue wave” raises the prospect of renewed efforts to roll back the OBBBA's tax reforms, deregulation, and shrinkage of government, along with greater regulatory scrutiny and possible restrictions on AI development and the construction of datacenters, natural gas pipelines, and nuclear facilities.

Such policies could impede the massive infrastructure buildout underpinning the investment boom, which has become a major driver of corporate capex, earnings growth, and broader economic activity. Combined with growing investor scrutiny of hyperscaler spending and ROI, the prospect of stiff political obstacles to this transformative secular technology and economic cycle may be adding another layer of uncertainty to a market already concerned about whether the massive “all-in” capital spending on the various acronyms AI/SI/ASI/RSI will generate adequate returns to justify it all. Some commentators estimate that it will take $1 trillion in revenue run-rate by end of 2028 to justify the capital commitments, which leaves little room for a slowdown.

Nevertheless, assuming the October selloff was driven more by technicals and macro worries rather than earnings growth, and assuming the president’s veto power can stave off the wolves if the blue wave happens, optimistic investors now enjoy much better equity valuations, not just on the broad market but on many of the technology leaders and cutting-edge innovators. Moreover, the rapid surge in risk-free rates—that have been squeezing valuations by raising both corporate borrowing costs and the discount rate applied to future cash flows—seems to have weathered a “blowoff top” and cycle peak, as I suggested was underway in my 10/6 post. Regardless, most of the leading corporations seem to be tolerating higher interest rates pretty well.

As a reminder, corporate revenue tends to track nominal GDP growth. So, with real US GDP coming in at 3.4% annualized pace for Q3 2026 and the Atlanta Fed GDPNow model estimating Q4 at 3.7% (as of 11/2), it means nominal GDP growth (including the GDP deflator for Q3 of 2.2%) is 5.6-5.9%, supporting strong revenue growth, which is well above today’s 4.9% 10-year yield. This suggests that economic output and tax revenues are expanding faster than long-term borrowing costs, making debt easier to service while keeping financial conditions stimulative.

I hear the argument that rates are merely normalizing back to pre-GFC/ZIRP levels and that this 0.7% growth-to-yield spread in a highly resilient economy will keep upward pressure on interest rates. But this isn’t your father’s economy, and it certainly doesn’t mean today’s economy can readily absorb a “mean reversion” in interest rates. Today’s hyper-financialized, post-GFC/ZIRP global economy had become so accustomed to assuming lots of debt because rates were so low, which means that rising rates could cripple the many vulnerable debt-addicted businesses, governments (including our own massive federal debt), and a housing market (which is critical for a healthy consumer) stubbornly priced for low mortgage rates and low inventory. And most of this debt is either floating-rate or must keep rolling over through refinance.

In addition, 30-year mortgage rates (reaching as high as 7.4% recently) certainly have been even higher in the past. But home prices today are largely based on that lower baseline of post-GFC easing and ultra-low rates. And given recent strengthening of the US dollar, some emerging market economies with dollar-denominated debt may be forced into default.

In other words, outside of the largest corporations with fortress balance sheets, today’s highly indebted global financial system simply can’t handle the current level of interest rates.

Economist and liquidity expert Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital sees cracks in the veneer of economic strength. He says that while capital markets were traditionally intended to raise new capital for real-world investments, infrastructure, and projects, today the reality is that 70-80% of all global financial transactions are simply rolling over existing debt, effectively turning the global financial system into a massive "refinancing machine."

Furthermore, I do not buy the “persistently elevated inflation” narrative. I believe underlying core inflation is stable and structural disinflationary trends are poised to take control once the energy/supply shocks are resolved. Indeed, I continue to assert that Fed rate hikes are a policy mistake for our bifurcated K-shaped economy (although it is notable that M2 money supply continues to grow at the same decent clip since 2024). We have soaring corporate profits and stock prices juxtaposed with stagnant labor and housing markets, negative real wage growth, a falling personal saving rate, and surging bond credit spreads.

In my comprehensive commentary below, I discuss:

 1. The booming IPO market
 2. Earnings and valuations
 3. Stock valuations and bond yields
 4. Jitters over the AI trade
 5. Surging credit spreads
 6. GDP, industrial production, and productivity
 7. Inflation and the K-shaped economy
 8. What should the Fed take from this?
 9. China’s economy is a growing problem for the world
10. My Final Comments section on the oath of office, crisis in France, and AI fearmongering
11. Sabrient’s sector rankings, positioning of our sector rotation model, and some top-ranked ETF ideas

The combination of high bond yields, surging credit spreads, geopolitical risks, elevated oil prices, ongoing supply shocks, election uncertainty, and jitters about both AI safety and when significant ROI will arrive for the massive AI capex are conspiring to hurt investor confidence and drive down valuation multiples more than recent S&P price action reflects, as overall earnings and guidance continue to march higher. Indeed, a market correction has been underway for months, even though the broad cap-weighted market indexes hasn’t reflected it. While a relatively small group of large stocks kept the S&P 500 near its highs, valuations across much of the market have been declining for months as investors are increasingly rewarding companies with stronger profitability, healthier balance sheets and more dependable earnings while assigning lower valuations to businesses whose prospects are less certain.

The aggregate P/E multiple is down over 20% from its high, and EPS growth is expected to slow substantially next year, albeit from an incredibly (and unsustainably) high level. And credit markets are getting more selective, forcing a quality rotation that includes equities—an internal rotation rather than an abandonment of stocks. So, when I talk about greater market breadth being “healthy” for the market, I’m not talking about equal-weight outperforming cap-weight for an extended period. No, after such periodic periods of cleansing the leverage and speculation, we still need Technology sector leadership, including from Big Tech. But having broader participation across the stock market with more (if not all) “boats” lifted is healthy and desirable for the stock market for many of the same reasons that having broader participation from the lower leg of the K-shaped economy is healthy and desirable for the economy and society.

However, the Fed knows that credit spreads have surged as investors seek either higher quality or greater compensation for elevated risk. But only CCC or worse are in distressed territory. This is yet another sign of the neglected lower-leg of the K-shaped economy being left behind in this AI infrastructure-driven economy, and why I urge the Fed not to hike rates any further—and in fact should cut back toward a 3.0-3.25% fed funds rate (FFR). Look, I understand the argument that today’s rates are simply normalizing to pre-GFC levels. And I am not talking about a return to ZIRP (zero interest rate policy), which created essentially “free money” leading to plenty of malinvestment in unworthy, highly speculative companies, products, and ventures—including non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs).

I just want to see a more broad-based economy (i.e., more boats lifted) in which most if not all industries are participating. Keeping floating-rate debt manageable is a step in that direction. So, I’m thinking that a funds rate of 3.25% at the top end plus an historical average spread of 125 bps for the 10-year Treasury should put 10-year at about 4.5%. This suggests nominal GDP growth (with today’s growth-to-yield spread of 0.7%) of around 5.0-5.2%. With the GDP deflator falling to 2.0%, we would have sustainable real GDP growth at a solid 3.0%.

Overall, I see the US economy as more recession-resistant, more technology-efficient, more services-oriented (meaning less energy-intensive and less at risk of inventory buildup that must be dumped cheaply into the market, like China does), and thus less cyclical. So, a steadier, more predictable economy means structurally higher corporate margins, earnings, cash flow, and capex consistency, which supports higher valuation multiples, lower credit spreads, a subdued VIX, and a buy-the-dip investor mentality. It seems that only a resurgence in bond yields, an AI-related credit crisis, or a harsh political disruption could derail it.

As such, I still think the S&P 500 has a shot at hitting 8,000 by year-end. But it largely depends on the ongoing Q3 earnings reports and forward guidance, which have illuminated some concerns among juggernauts—including Meta (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN) all spending well beyond their monstrous cash generation on their AI buildouts and pushing each company into deep, historically unprecedented negative free cash flow. Expectations are becoming challenging. As the GMO Asset Allocation team observed, “For the first time in twenty years, with the brief exception of the Global Financial Crisis, we are seeing net dilution in the U.S. stock market (i.e., share issuance exceeding share buybacks) as the hyperscalers continue their capital expenditure spree.”

Moreover, I expect a continuation of the market broadening beyond just the AI trade, and I continue to see opportunities in active stock selection, equal-weight indexes, value stocks, cyclical sectors, small caps, and bond-alternative dividend payers. Indeed, Sabrient’s quant-based, actively selected (“quantamental”), equal-weight Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Dividend, and Small Cap Growth portfolios have been largely outperforming their benchmarks—several by substantial margins. And as a reminder, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is licensed as a quality prescreen to the actively managed, low-beta First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS), which now holds more than $2.6 billion in AUM.

Lastly, with a highly consequential election upon us, I hope you vote for policies over personalities, and long-term success and prosperity over short-term band-aids. There are those among us who are blissfully ignorant of and unburdened by our ancestors’ centuries of accumulated wisdom, trial and error, what works and what doesn’t, who think they know better how to maximize the potential and wellbeing of both individuals and society as a whole despite the harsh lessons of history and despite many candidates never having managed a successful enterprise themselves, much less a nation. Worse, many voters simply go for “the other guy” if they aren’t happy with their lives today, no matter how impractical the other guy’s proposed solutions. I have more to say about this in my Final Comments section below.

Here is a link to this full post in printable PDF format. As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event.  Read on….

  by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

Quick portfolio update: Sabrient’s Q3 2026 Baker’s Dozen quarterly portfolio launched on 7/20 with a diverse group of 13 stocks across market caps and business sectors, including both prominent and under-the-radar names. Also, the new Sabrient Dividend 57 quarterly portfolio just launched on 8/4 as a growth & income strategy, with a diverse group of 48 high-quality stocks across market caps and sectors and a current yield of 3.8%. Additionally, our annual Forward Looking Value 14 portfolio will launch on 8/26 with a diverse group of high-quality, value-oriented stocks having good growth potential across market caps and sectors.

Overview

There has been outsized investor focus on inflation and the Fed’s response to it—something that new chairman Kevin Warsh is trying to diminish. He has stated, "…market participants are learning to play the ball, not the referee." Warsh has suggested a preference fulfilling the mandate of price stability through a combination of lower policy rates, continued balance sheet reduction, and structural reform of the official inflation metrics (which rely on many lagged, imputed, and low-relevance components). Some observers and several FOMC members say we must have rate hikes to control the inflationary spiral, while others say we need rate cuts to boost the struggling lower leg of our K-shaped economy (lower-income and working-class consumers, small businesses, and housing) and the alarmingly low personal savings rate (2.7% versus a long-term average of 8.3%) that has been supporting personal consumption. Count me in the latter group, as I explain in my full commentary below.

But that’s not stopping the bond vigilantes from boycotting the massive issuance of debt and thus pushing up longer-term rates at an alarming pace, which negatively impacts mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and the discount rate on stock valuations. Uncertainty leads to higher term premiums. It might be not only a protest against rising federal debt but also anticipation of the Fed shrinking its balance sheet (aka QT), which pulls cash (bank reserves) out of the financial system while increasing the supply of bonds in the market (leading to higher yields)—even though the Fed has already reduced its balance sheet by $2.4 trillion (from $9 trillion in 2022) to remove about half its pandemic-era QE accumulation.

As a result, 10-year Treasury yields made another new 18-month high at 4.74% at the end of July, and the 30-year reached its highest yield since 2007 of 5.27%, entirely due to rising real rates not inflation expectations (which remain modest). Although yields pulled back last week on hopeful Iran news, plunging crude oil prices, and weak jobs reports, providing hope of a less restrictive Fed. So, although longer-term yields may well rise further—with the 10-year potentially challenging 5% for the first time in three years—I see this as a buying opportunity for fixed income, such as with iShares 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TLT) with a current yield of 4.75%, particularly if inflation has seen its peak and is pulling back, as I suspect it is.

The federal deficit is now roughly $2 trillion out of a $7 trillion total budget (that’s nearly 30% of the total budget!), which must be financed through Treasury issuance. And roughly half that deficit is interest on debt payments (now exceeding $1 trillion/yr and growing fast), which rises as debt increases, requiring new issuances and debt rollovers—both at higher interest rates than before as the Treasury Dept. has focused on the short end of the yield curve, thus lowering the weighted average maturity of federal debt.

It’s a death spiral rapidly overwhelming the budget, which (as I have discussed at length in many prior posts) must be addressed with a 3-prong approach of: 1) growing away the debt through robust GDP growth given that tax receipts historically average 17% of GDP no matter the tax rates, 2) cutting away the debt through reduced spending growth below the rate of GDP growth and rooting out waste and fraud, and 3) inflating away the debt through elevated inflation rates that reduce the dollar value of the debt.

Meanwhile, the giant hyperscalers are not only spending most or all of the massive cash flows but are also flooding the corporate bond market with as much as $1 trillion for AI infrastructure buildout. So, perhaps part of Warsh’s plan is to let the market do the dirty work of suppressing economic activity by raising longer-term rates—leading to higher mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and the discount rate on stocks valuations—hopefully not to the point of causing a recession.

For now, there is no sign of recession as the Atlanta Federal Reserve’s purely model-driven GDPNow forecast shows an estimate for Q3 real GDP growth of a robust +5.8% as of 8/6 (although the more nuanced consensus of “Blue Chip” economists is only 2.0%). You might recall the forecast showing strong numbers for Q2 with a high of +4.3% in late May before falling to a low of +1.2% in early July, with the final BEA report coming in at just +1.5%. Nonetheless, there was plenty of good in the report, as non-government private spending (consumers and private fixed investment) grew +3.9%.

And although this private spending was offset by 1) falling net exports (as imports surged +11.5%, driven by AI-related components), which alone reduced the final number by 1.01 percentage points (pps), and 2) private inventory drawdowns, which reduced it by 0.67 pps, both of these metrics in fact reflect robust underlying domestic demand, consumer spending, corporate capex, and overall economic activity. Indeed, when high imports and low inventories suppress GDP, it typically suggests impending economic acceleration and revved-up domestic manufacturing, which would boost GDP metrics in subsequent quarters—which the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast seems to be reflecting.

In my full commentary below, I discuss:

1. The selloff in the AI trade and the restoration of Apple’s prominence
2. Hyperscaler capex, free cash flow, and power demand
3. Solid GDP growth but mixed messages on jobs and housing
4. Trends in inflation, supply chain pressures, and productivity
5. The bond vigilantes, rising federal debt, China’s woes, and Fed policy
6. My final comments section pushing back on the overwrought AI backlash/alarmism
7. Sabrient’s sector rankings, positioning of our sector rotation model, and some top-ranked ETF ideas

With all the turmoil in the AI trade, which was overdue after such a meteoric rise, market leadership continues to broaden and rotate. The fact that the market rotated rather than sell everything and go to cash is encouraging and suggestive of continued bullish conviction. Russell 2000 companies’ earnings growth forecasts for CY2026 have climbed to 38% from about 23% at the beginning of the year—in spite of rising interest rates that tend to have outsized impact on the floating-rate debt typically carried by smaller firms. And the equal-weight S&P 500 ETF (RSP) is approaching $100 billion in AUM, with performance led by many of the “S&P 493” rather than the MAG7.

Chamath Palihapitiya, entrepreneur and All-In Podcast team member, recently quipped, “Fundraising requires narrative, and ‘we are building God’ is a better pitch than ‘we wrote some very clever linear algebra, pirated the internet, and threw a bunch of compute at it.’”  Perhaps that’s what investors reduced it to as they abandoned the AI trade—at least for the moment. And perhaps it is true that our economy has been overly reliant upon AI-led expansion with yet-to-be-proven ROI, especially datacenters.

Indeed, the dollar value of datacenter construction plus computers and communications equipment are up 23% YoY, with the hyperscalers’ capex [in order of dollar commitments: Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta (META), Oracle (ORCL), and now SpaceX (SPCX)] projected to be in the range of $700-800 billion for CY2026 (40% higher than CY2025)—leading to reduced shareholder-friendly buybacks but surging global semiconductor sales. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association, chip sales worldwide were up +123% YoY in the month of June, totaling over $400 billion during Q2, and are expected to exceed $1.5 trillion for CY2026.

That’s a lot of investment to recover. But as Tech executive and investor Nat Friedman opined, “Pessimists sound smart. Optimists make money.” Indeed, longer term, I believe the broad potential ROI of AI—in reshaping our economy and society through massive productivity gains, solving complex scientific and technological challenges, and fundamentally transforming the workplace and daily life—is stronger and materializing faster than anticipated even at the beginning of the year.

The use cases and compute demand for AI have barely begun to manifest, with a future encompassing autonomous transportation, factory automation, humanoid robots, personal assistants for hundreds of millions of individual users, and AI assistance on everything from drones for law enforcement, to surgery and drug discovery, to optimized asset maintenance, smart grid energy, and fraud monitoring—not to mention the associated power demand for it all.

So, am I concerned about whether the massive AI capex by the hyperscalers on infrastructure (like datacenters) and power generation will see attractive ROI anytime soon? I am not. In fact, I bought into the July “tech wreck,” including some names in memory and storage as well as the MAG7 ETF (MAGS), and I bought into the “SaaSpocalypse” in February and again in April via the iShares Tech-Software ETF (IGV). In its earnings report the other day, Palantir (PLTR) described commercial demand as “otherworldly,” and the stock surged 30%. In my view, for anyone who felt they had missed the boat on the AI surge and didn’t want to chase it—this was the pullback you were waiting for.

Of course, there is no guarantee that the market won’t turn tail once again, given the unresolved conflict with Iran and its terrorist proxies and the real potential for reescalation. And besides Iran, a plethora of uncertainties persist with oil prices, shipping and supply chains, trade deals and tariffs, Ukraine, China, Japanese yen, federal debt, civil strife, midterm elections and the unnerving rise of DSA candidates, inflation, jobs, and monetary policy from a revamped Fed. Did I miss anything?

But fundamental tailwinds still outweigh headwinds, in my view, given AI optimism, robust capex, deregulation, lower taxes, re-privatization, re-industrialization (onshoring of manufacturing), diversification of supply chains (not deglobalization), rising productivity/margins/earnings, low credit spreads, and resumed disinflationary trends. Deregulation is focused heavily on encouraging domestic fossil fuel production, less burdensome financial oversight, and less onerous climate rules, mostly to the advantage of Energy, Financials, and Industrials sectors.

Forward P/E multiples have receded largely due to a rising discount rate as bond yields surge. And yet stocks keep going up on the back of incredible earnings growth and fast-rising forward estimates. According to First Trust, “Analyst estimates have increased as the year has unfolded, with Large Cap, Mid Cap, and Small Cap Index EPS estimated to reach a record $354.46, $219.63, and $107.53, respectively, in 2026 (as of 8/3/26) [according to Bloomberg]. For comparison, analyst estimates were much lower at the start of the year, with the same indices estimated to see calendar year 2026 earnings of $310.84, $202.91, and $96.06 (as of 12/31/25).”

Indeed, the S&P 500 is on pace for blended earnings growth in Q2 of 47% versus a forecast of 23% just a few weeks ago. However, if you strip out Amazon (AMZN) and Alphabet (GOOGL), whose incredible earnings reports were largely driven by non-operating gains on investments in Anthropic and SpaceX, the blended S&P 500’s blended EPS growth falls to around 29%, which is still quite impressive.

Overall, given the market broadening beyond the Big Tech titans, and assuming the Fed does not become more hawkish, I continue to see opportunities in active stock selection, as well as in cyclicals, value stocks, small caps, and bond-alternative dividend payers. Indeed, Sabrient’s Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Small Cap Growth, and Dividend portfolios have been largely outperforming their benchmarks—some by substantial margins. And as a reminder, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is licensed as a quality prescreen to the actively managed, low-beta First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS), which now has nearly $2.5 billion in AUM.

By the way, in my July post, I wrote a long Final Comments section on the alarming rise of socialism, which I would encourage you to read if you haven’t already. Although I acknowledge the disparate impacts of the K-shaped economy, the socialists’ harping on fairness and wealth inequality is largely a red herring as living standards, real incomes, consumption, and life expectancies have generally risen across demographics nationally. It certainly doesn’t warrant dismantling the capitalist system that has created so much innovation, value, wealth, comfort, and good for the world.

The exception to broadly rising living standards seems to lie in many of our deep-blue cities and states. So today, let me also add a comment on the “affordability” issue that has become the main talking point of the Left against the Trump Administration. The reality is that the bluest cities and states tend to have the worst affordability, as reinforced by US News & World Report’s latest 2026 rankings of states that put California dead last in its specific “Affordability” metric, followed by other deep-blue states, namely New Jersey, Hawaii, New York, Washington, Massachusetts, Maryland, and Colorado. It also put California dead last for the broader “Opportunity” category, which comprises the subcategories of Economic Opportunity, Affordability, and Equality across demographic groups.

So, don’t be gaslighted by deceptive electioneering. The answer is not to double down on the same misguided and counterproductive policies—like onerous zoning restrictions and permitting processes, punitive taxation, high energy prices, mandated worker benefits, rent control, sanctuary policies, and permissiveness on crime and homelessness—that have degraded quality of life for everyone while inviting fraud and corruption. Rather, voters should pivot back to embracing free markets, meritocracy, property rights, and the rule of law that built our great country. Such principles have proven much more adept at solving problems than dogmatic bureaucrats, virtually none of whom have any private-sector leadership experience. Affordability is a genuine problem, particularly in several high-cost blue states, and policymakers in these locales shouldn't assume that further expanding redistribution or intervention policies will solve the problems that were likely created by these policies in the first place.

Here is a link to this full post in printable PDF format. As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event!  Read on….

  by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

Quick note: Sabrient’s new Small Cap Growth 52 Portfolio just launched on 6/17 as a 15-month portfolio holding 43 stocks across a range of sectors. It offers an alpha-seeking alternative to the broad small-cap indexes. Notably SCG 46 is the next to terminate on 7/22, and it currently shows a gross total return of +81% vs. +48% for its benchmark S&P SmallCap 600 Growth (SLYG), as well as 61% for Russell 2000 Small Caps (IWM), and +43% for S&P 500 (SPY), as of 6/22.

Overview

The resilient bull market continues to be powered by a compelling combination of technological innovation, robust corporate earnings, resilient consumer spending (despite energy and supply-driven inflationary pressures), and investor optimism around productivity-driven economic growth, despite ongoing macro uncertainties (there’s always something). Notably, the April rally off the market correction was broad-based, then May saw a marked narrowing with Tech the clear leader while most other sectors struggling (as bond yields surged, which hurts interest-rate sensitive industries), and now June has the market resuming its broadening efforts, as evidenced by price action (including a new high for the Russell 2000 small caps) and a convergence in forward P/E multiples (e.g., cap-weight S&P 500 falling, equal-weight S&P 500 and Russell 2000 small caps rising).

In my full commentary below, I discuss:

1. Relative valuations and the SpaceX-led parade of mega-IPOs on tap
2. GDP, inflation, jobs, and productivity
3. Fed policy in the new Kevin Warsh chairmanship
4. AI backlash, the realities, and how to address it
5. Datacenter power demand and the NIMBY problem
6. My final comments section on government versus private sector capital allocation and ROI
7. Sabrient’s sector rankings, positioning of our sector rotation model, and some top-ranked ETF ideas

As I discussed in my May post, valuations in the broad market indexes have been falling even as the market has surged, as earnings surged at an even faster rate. The equal-weight indexes have outperformed their cap-weight brethren, most notably in the Tech sector, with the MAG-7 badly underperforming the aggregate of everyone else in the sector. Who are the new leaders? Those benefiting from all the hyperscalers’ capex, including names like Sandisk (SNDK), Western Digital (WDC), Seagate Technology (STX), Micron (MU), Broadcom (AVGO), Dell (DELL), Vertiv (VRT), Quanta Services (PWR), EMCOR (EME), Arista Networks (ANET), Bloom Energy (BE), Comfort Systems (FIX), and Sterling Infrastructure (STRL)—many of which have been holdings in Sabrient’s quarterly Baker’s Dozen portfolios.

With the splashy IPO debut of Elon Musk’s SpaceX (SPCX), there are now 12 companies in the $1 trillion market cap club as of 6/19 [including lone non-Tech name Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B]. And given the rest of the mega-IPO lineup expected this year, some commentators are suggesting a new Big Tech-leadership acronym, such as “MANGOS”—Meta, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Google, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Or the “AI Big 10” that adds Micron, AMD, and Broadcom to the existing MAG-7.

Many of the main headwinds of H1 seem to be finding resolution. The Iran conflict is apparently winding down, and oil price has tumbled from around $105/bbl at its May peak to below $75/bbl (front-month futures contract for WTI on NYMEX), which soon will be reflected in inflation metrics. Consumer spending and retail sales have held up despite falling real wage growth, and now the extremely poor consumer and investor sentiment metrics are showing nascent signs of improvement—although still far from the euphoria or “irrational exuberance” of the dot-com era. Also, the huge SpaceX IPO hit the market without any notable damage.

Overall, I still think fundamental tailwinds outweigh headwinds as investors position for continued AI progress, robust capex for AI, reshoring, and re-industrialization, looser Fed monetary policy, resurgence in global liquidity growth, and One Big Beautifull Bill Act (OBBBA) policies fully kicking in with its pro-growth policies like tax reform, deregulation, smaller government, pro-energy protocols, and broad support for the private sector to retake its rightful place as the primary engine of growth via re-privatization, reshoring, and re-industrialization, with much more efficient capital allocation and ROI than government.

Furthermore, this should continue to attract foreign capital into the US (“shadow liquidity,” much of which is not counted in M2), cut the debt and deficit-to-GDP ratio, and unleash organic private sector growth. Today’s valuations are reasonable, particularly given rising corporate earnings forecasts (now at +23% YoY for CY2026), but future stock valuations likely will be driven more by rising earnings and ROI than by AI hope-driven multiple expansion, particularly given the lingering macro uncertainties and the risk of higher interest rates.

In addition, aside from the oil and supply-driven disruptions that have temporarily goosed inflation metrics, many disinflationary trends are still in place, including the secular implementation of AI and automation, rising productivity, falling shelter costs, the deflationary impulse from a struggling China, a stable/rising dollar (up nearly 5% YTD), and slow M2 growth (about 4.7% vs. last year and 3.5% annualized over the past 3 years, vs. 6.0% pre-pandemic average since 1960). So, as supply chains are repaired and rerouted (as I discussed in my April post) and as oil prices and inflation recede, we could see some multiple expansion—to perhaps as high as 24x on the S&P 500 (after the recent contraction to below 22x on a next-12-months basis)—which would further support stocks. Indeed, the market seems to be setting up the next up leg. Every dip has been a buying opportunity. According to InvesTech Research, “Margin Debt as a percentage of nominal GDP shot up 9% in May, reaching a new all-time high.”

Q1 earnings reporting season was stellar, with robust YoY earnings growth, margins, and productivity, plus rising forward guidance and analyst earnings forecasts. Blended EPS growth across sectors was up 28% in Q1, led by Tech sector at 54%. Revenue growth was 11%, led by Tech at 16%. Profit margins were 15%, led by Tech at 29%. But because EPS growth has exceeded price performance, the P/E multiple has shrunk. The S&P 500 started the year at 6,845 and closed last week at 7,500. The latest Wall Street consensus for S&P 500 operating EPS is about $339 for 2026 (implied P/E of 22.1x based on $7,500 price) and $392 for 2027 (forward P/E of 19.1x on current price). Both are roughly 10% higher than at the start of the year. An official resolution to the Iran conflict and supply shock could allow for some multiple expansion, perhaps pushing the forward P/E to 24x—which implies the S&P 500 Index hitting 8,000 by year-end 2026 and potentially 9,300 by year-end 2027. Are these realistic targets? Not out of the question, in my view, although bouts of volatility along the way surely should be expected—perhaps severe pullbacks as price stretches from moving averages (like a rubberband).

As the S&P 500’s concentration in Big Tech has grown, its dividend yield has compressed to below 1.0%—reminiscent of the late-1990s and well below its multi-decade average around 1.7%—mainly because those high-growth Big Tech companies that dominate the cap-weight index don’t need to pay dividends to attract investors. Instead, investors are willing to pay up for strong growth and high margins, increasingly discounting a world in which AI becomes deeply embedded in business operations in a long-term secular investment cycle rather than short-term cyclical trend. And this is in spite of the elevated benchmark 10-year Treasury yield around 4.5%, which normally would suppress valuation multiples (on a discounted cash flow basis). Although Big Tech is largely immune to interest rate volatility, the smaller companies—into which the market is seeking to broaden—are not.

Furthermore, many uncertainties remain. Investors are concerned about the worrisome inflation prints, Fed policy under the new chairmanship, and the concise-but-vague MOU with Iran. Moreover, the long stretch of years in which demand for US stocks has far outstripped supply (“scarcity”) seems to be suddenly reversing. The line-up of mega-IPOs this year, pre-IPO shares coming out of lock-up, and Big Tech’s shift from using its massive cash flow for share buybacks to supplementing cash with new share issuances to instead fund historic levels of AI-related capex for datacenters, advanced compute hardware (chips, memory, servers), networking, and power infrastructure. According to Michael Gayed, the four largest hyperscalers (Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon) spent $416 billion on capex in 2025 and have projected 2026 capex of $725 billion.
 
Concurrently, there is concern about Big Tech earnings quality and circular financing (e.g., NVIDIA investing in its customers who in turn buy NVIDIA’s GPUs), not to mention speculation on how soon all this massive AI spend will pay off (i.e., ROI) and what happens if and when the capex firehose dials down or shuts off. However, as the engraving in every convex passenger-side car mirror reminds us, “Objects in the mirror may be closer than they appear,” which certainly seems to be the case with AI as fundamentals are evolving much faster and impacting workflows much sooner than most anyone expected.

As for the Fed’s increasingly hawkish stance and rising odds of a rate hike (like the ECB just instituted), my view is that a hike won’t reduce the oil or food prices that are driving up the inflation metrics unless it induces an economic recession, which is not what the Fed or anyone wants to see. Assuming the Iran conflict is indeed coming to an end, inflation and interest rates likely have topped, with disinflationary structural trends resuming control and bonds catching a bid.

I remain of the belief that interest rate-sensitive segments of the economy, including housing, homebuyers, small businesses, and lower-income consumers, are already struggling with current financing and mortgage rates, offset only by the locked-in low interest rates from 2020-21, in a K-shaped economy, with higher income people doing well and spending, while lower income is being squeezed. For instance, higher income households have not reduced their driving habits at all, while most others have, and teenagers are having a hard time finding summer jobs due to all the older workers who have re-entered the workplace to supplement their retirement income. Moreover, the still-solid GDP growth metrics have been overly reliant on the combination of the AI race and its massive infrastructure spending, financed mostly on Big Tech cash flow than debt, plus unsustainable levels of fiscal deficit spending—i.e., around $1.9 trillion or 5.8% federal deficit-to-GDP, which includes $1 trillion in interest payments on 100% publicly held federal debt-to-GDP (and 123% total debt-to-GDP).

Notably, if you look solely at the primary deficit (excluding interest on debt), the ratio to GDP is 2.6% (20.1% spending minus 17.5% total revenue), which exceeds the 50-year historical average of 1.7% primary deficit-to-GDP ratio. If any of this spending slows, recessionary conditions might follow. In other words, we need all segments of the economy to flourish, and that can be supported by lower rates. And by the way, elevated inflation helps “inflate away” the debt as long as growth in real (after-inflation) GDP is positive (preferably strongly positive, like 2.5% or more) and exceeds growth in deficit spending, and interest rates remain contained (including any financial repression or yield curve control).

Having a hyper-financialized global economy means that rising rates could cripple debt-addicted businesses, governments (including our own federal government), and the housing market (which is critical for a healthy consumer). Sure, mortgage rates have been much higher in the past, but home prices today are based on a lower baseline of post-GFC easing and low rates. And given recent strengthening of the dollar, some emerging market economies with dollar-denominated debt may be forced into default. In other words, today’s global financial system simply can’t handle higher US interest rates.

Given the market broadening beyond the Big Tech titans, and assuming the Fed does not become overly hawkish, we continue to see opportunities in active stock selection, small caps, and bond-alternative dividend payers. Indeed, Sabrient’s Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Small Cap Growth, and Dividend portfolios have been largely outperforming their benchmarks. Our latest Q2 2026 Baker’s Dozen Portfolio launched on 4/17 as a 15-month portfolio with a mid-cap bias and a diverse group of 13 stocks across eight business sectors. After two months, it is already off to a good start, up +9.5% vs. +5.1% for SPY and +3.6% for equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP), as of 6/22. Notably, last year’s Q1 2025 Baker’s Dozen terminated on 4/20 with a gross total return of +46.7% vs. +20.3% for SPY, and the next-to-terminate Q2 2025 portfolio is up +61% vs. +43% for SPY and +32% for RSP. And, as a reminder, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is licensed to the actively managed, low-beta First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS) as a quality prescreen. FTLS now has $2.4 billion in AUM.

Sabrient employs a variety of fundamental financial factors in our quantitative models and portfolio selection process. Sabrient Scorecards for Stocks and ETFs are investor tools that provide access to several of our proprietary models for idea generation and portfolio monitoring. To learn more, I invite you to visit https://MoonRocksToPowerStocks.com where you can download founder David Brown’s latest book (an Amazon international bestseller) and 2 bonus reports (on investing in the Future of Energy and Space Exploration)—all in PDF format—and start subscribing to the Scorecards, which make David’s process easy for idea generation and portfolio monitoring. They include our Top 30 stocks each week for 4 distinct investing strategies—Growth, Value, Dividend, and Small Cap. To go straight to the Scorecard subscription, go to: https://www.moonrockstopowerstocks.com/sabrient-scorecard

Here is a link to the post in printable PDF format. As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event!  Click here to continue reading my full commentary....