by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

 Overview

Bullish conviction was severely tested in November for the first time since the April “Liberation Day” selloff. All the naysayers quickly piled on with warnings of an AI bubble and financial returns on immense capex not being realized for many years, if ever. To make matters worse, they warned of sluggish global liquidity growth in the face of rising debt and an impending “debt maturity wall,” i.e., enormous government and corporate refinancing that could overwhelm capital markets, surge borrowing rates, tighten lending standards, crowd out smaller businesses, and thereby constrain economic growth. But alas, the fear didn’t last long, as the old “bad news is good news” narrative was resurrected to predict increasingly dovish Fed monetary policy would save the day. Indeed, it appears that the S&P 500 still has a shot at finishing 2025 with its third straight year of 20%+ returns (which would be only the second time in history, after the five straight years of the 1995-99 dotcom/Y2K run). And yet the K-shaped economy (i.e., investor/creditor class vs. working/debtor class) is leaving too many citizens behind, particularly young and working-class people.

Remember the famous quote from the fearsome heavyweight champion boxer Mike Tyson, “Everyone has a plan until they get hit in the face”? Well, Steve Forbes had a similar quote for the stock market, “Everyone is a disciplined, long-term investor…until the market goes down.” Indeed, the AI-driven bull run seemed uninterruptable for over six months, with the S&P 500’s 50-day moving average providing reliable support all along the way…at least until 11/17 when for the first time in 138 days (since 4/30) the index closed below its 50-day moving average and triggered a panicky selloff. And then even after another incredible earnings report on 11/19 from market leader NVIDIA (NVDA) that sent the market surging higher on 11/20, by mid-day it came crashing back down on news suggesting maybe the jobs market really wasn’t so bad, which led to worries that the Fed might not cut this month after all, and the market finished the day with a big, ugly, red bearish-engulfing candle. As they say, the more overbought, the worse the correction.

But thankfully, that big, bad, bearish-engulfing candle turned out to be a double-bottom (with the 10/10 low). The S&P 500 found support at its 100-day moving average and then embarked on a rally that has almost entirely retraced its fall from October’s all-time high. It has largely been a speculative “junk rally,” led by the “meme” stocks—like the Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and the iShares Micro-cap ETF (IWC), followed by the lower-quality small-cap iShares Russell 2000 (IWM), in which about 40% are unprofitable, then the higher-quality small-cap SPDR S&P 600 (SPSM), in which all are required to be profitable for index entry, and with the mid and large caps trailing behind. Defensives have lagged since April, as illustrated in the chart below showing the ratio of the S&P 500 Low Volatility (SPLV) divided by the S&P 500 High Beta (SPHB), which after a brief jump during the November pullback has returned to its extreme low.

Interestingly, the stock market briefly added a new member of the $1 trillion market cap club during the broad market correction, with drugmaker Lilly & Co. (LLY) enjoying a huge November surge (along with much of the Healthcare sector overall, in a mean reversion catch-up), largely driven by sales in its weight-loss drug Zepbound. So, as LLY pulled back, the trillion-dollar club today is back to 10 members—the original MAG-7 (NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, MSFT, AMZN, META, TSLA) plus Broadcom (AVGO), Taiwan Semi (TSM), and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B).

Short-term technicals on the broad market indexes are overbought once again but still well supported within a bullish uptrend. Nevertheless, for the S&P 500 to hit the 20% return mark for the year will require a bullish catalyst. Most likely it will be the highly anticipated Fed rate cut this week, and importantly, some soothingly dovish words from chairman Jay Powell on additional easing measures plus guidance on the “dot plot” of future rate cuts. However, he can’t be overly dovish as to bring out the “bond vigilantes” in protest, spiking longer-term yields, which would not be favorable for stocks. Market maven Jim Bianco said in an interview on The Money Path that he thinks the tell will be in the number of FOMC member dissents on the expected rate cut, with several dissenters mollifying the bond vigilantes and no dissent angering them. So, Powell walks a tightrope on this, and messaging matters.

Regardless, the liquidity cycle is turning back up, with the Fed already halting its balance sheet reduction (quantitative tightening or QT) as of 12/1, and with more rate cuts in the offing, plus perhaps relaxed capital requirements for banks (like the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio or eSLR) and some form of "QE-lite" to gradually re-expand its balance sheet without antagonizing the bond market. All of this should result in rising M2 money supply. In addition, China has introduced fiscal stimulus and monetary tactics like repurchase operations (“repo”) and a lowered bank reserve requirement ratio (RRR). Furthermore, supply chain pressures are muted, fiscal expansion is underway with lower tax rates and less red tape from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and money market funds (aka cash on the sidelines) exceed $8 trillion (the highest ever).

In fact, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow is projecting real GDP growth of 3.5% growth in Q3, and forecasters think Q1 2026 might see US growth above 4% given the imminent fiscal impulse (including massive tax refunds in Q1) that should boost the struggling consumer. So, aggregate demand would be expected to rise, likely above the rate of aggregate supply since demand can shift much faster than supply can adjust to match. This would lift asset prices initially, which could be inflationary. As such, some market commentators believe the fed funds neutral rate should match the current rate of nominal GDP growth of 5-6%.

I’m not one of those people. I think any short-term inflationary pressures will be fleeting and offset by the secular disinflationary pressures I often describe: Global Supply Chain Pressure Index (GSCPI) continues to hover at or below the zero line (i.e., its historical average), the benefits of globalization (including comparative advantage) persist despite some strategic onshoring and supply chain diversification, there is a deflationary impulse from China as its dumps cheap goods on the world market in the face of weak domestic demand, and productivity continues to increase through automation and disruptive innovation (including Gen AI).

So, my long-held view remains that a terminal/neutral rate near 3.0% seems right, and the latest fed funds futures suggest 66% odds we get there next year—and that likelihood should increase with the appointment of a new Fed chairman in May (most likely economist Kevin Hassett). Bond yields have normalized with the 10-year Treasury under 4.2%. The flatter yield curve is a market signal to the Fed that it should cut on the short end. The economy needs lower interest rates, including a 30-year mortgage closer to 5%, in tandem with business-friendly fiscal policy and a weaker dollar to: a) sustain rising global liquidity, b) relieve indebted consumers and businesses, c) support US and global economies, and d) avert a global credit crisis. And once that neutral rate is achieved, the Fed can go back into the shadows where it was always intended to be and let fiscal, trade, and tax policies from Congress and the President dominate the news cycle. No more sitting on pins-and-needles at every FOMC meeting or Fed governor speaking engagement.

The return of the “bad news is good news” outlook has fed funds futures solidified at 89% odds of a December cut on 12/10. It also has pushed stocks to within spitting distance of new all-time highs. But notably, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies corrected much more sharply than stocks, mostly due to deleveraging, and have not yet bounced back like stocks have. Nevertheless, blockchain, tokenization, and stablecoin implementation continue to progress, so I’m not concerned about my crypto allocation—in fact, bitcoin might have just put in a bottom at its 100-week moving average.

Yes, uncertainty persists around trade deals, wars, rising debt, civil strife, stock valuations, a hesitant Fed, and potential government shutdown redux in late January. But investors are positioning for tax and interest rate cuts, deregulation, tame inflation, strong margins & earnings, improving revenue growth, re-privatization, re-industrialization, fast-tracking of power generation infrastructure, robust capex and share buybacks, rising liquidity, a potential “peace dividend,” and a continued flow of foreign capital into the US. Importantly, DataTrek pointed out that Q3 corporate revenue increased by a multi-year record of +8.4%, which is critical for future earnings power—as earnings growth via sales growth is better than cost cutting (higher quality earnings beats). Also, they point out that the percentage of after-tax operating earnings that paid for dividends and stock buybacks has fallen from 96% in 2018 to 81% today, which suggests the difference is being reinvested in business growth—and supports today’s elevated valuations.

In my full commentary below, I talk in greater depth about the K-shaped economy, electricity prices, earnings, debt, inflation, jobs, and Fed policy, as well as the difficulty in “turning the economic ship”—from overreliance on vast, stifling government spending to a robust, unleashed private sector—in the face of political obstructionism, a hostile media, and the impatience of voters in feeling the benefits of the newly passed fiscal stimulus package and the Fed’s monetary stimulus on affordability and mortgage rates, pushing many of them (especially young people and the lower-income/non-asset-holding working class) to shortsightedly embrace the “free stuff” promises of socialist candidates.

I close my commentary by revealing Sabrient’s latest fundamental-based SectorCast quantitative rankings of the ten U.S. business sectors, current positioning of our sector rotation model, and several top-ranked ETF ideas. Top-ranked sectors in Sabrient’s SectorCast model include Technology, Healthcare, and Financials. In addition, Basic Materials, Industrials, and Energy also seem poised to eventually benefit from fiscal and monetary stimulus, domestic capex tailwinds, a burgeoning commodity Supercycle, rising demand for natural gas for power generation, and more-disciplined capital spending programs.

History shows that rising GDP growth, stable inflation, and falling interest rates tend to favor small caps. And because small cap indexes are more heavily allocated to Industrials, Basic Materials, and Financials, enhanced infrastructure spending and a revved-up economy could disproportionately benefit them. Indeed, rather than a continuation of the FOMO/YOLO momentum rally on the backs of a narrow group of AI leaders (and some speculative coattail riders), I expect the euphoria will be more tempered next year such that we get a healthy broadening and wider participation across caps and sectors and with a greater focus on quality and profitability. There are plenty of neglected high-quality names worthy of investment dollars. So, rather than the passive cap-weighted indexes, investors may be better served by active stock selection that seeks to identify under-the-radar, undervalued, high-quality gems primed for explosive growth. This is what Sabrient seeks to do in our various portfolios, all of which provide exposure to Value, Quality, Growth, and Size factors and to both secular and cyclical growth trends.

Concerningly, only 22% of active fund managers are outperforming their passive benchmark this year, largely due to the narrow market leadership from the AI-leading Big Tech titans. However, Sabrient has been performing well. We are best known for our 13-stock “Baker’s Dozen” growth portfolio franchise, which is issued quarterly as a 15-month unit investment trust (UIT) by First Trust Portfolios, and each is designed to offer the potential for outsized gains. For example, the Q1 2024 Baker’s Dozen terminated on 4/21/25 with a gross return of +45.7% vs. +8.2% for S&P 500, and the Q3 2024 portfolio terminated on 10/20/25 up +41.7% vs. +24.1% for S&P 500.

In addition, last year’s 33-stock Forward Looking Value 12 terminated on 11/10/25 up +19.9% vs. +12.7% for the S&P 500 Value Index. Also, small caps tend to benefit most from lower rates and deregulation, and high dividend payers become more appealing as bond alternatives as interest rates fall, so Sabrient’s quarterly Small Cap Growth and Sabrient Dividend (growth & income strategy) also might be timely as beneficiaries of a broadening market.

The Baker’s Dozen growth portfolio and three offshoot strategies for value, dividend, and small cap all leverage Sabrient’s process-driven, growth-at-a-reasonable-price methodology, which was developed by founder David Brown. All four strategies are described in his latest book, Moon Rocks to Power Stocks: Proven Stock Picking Method Revealed by NASA Scientist Turned Portfolio Manager (catch the low-price promotion this week only!). To learn more about both the book and the companion subscription product we offer (which does most of the stock evaluation work for you), please visit: https://DavidBrownInvestingBook.com

Click HERE to find this post in printable PDF format, as well as my latest Baker’s Dozen presentation slide deck and my 3-part series on “The Future of Energy, the Lifeblood of an Economy.” As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event!  Read on….

  
  by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC
  
 Overview

As we close out H1 2025, markets seem eager to press higher on optimism about imminent fiscal stimulus and monetary policy support during H2—plus perhaps a “peace dividend” thrown in. Of course, investors at home and abroad know that President Trump will pull out all stops to demonstrate meaningful successes in raising organic economic growth and jobs creation, fostering an affordable and reliable energy supply for an electricity-hungry future, and leveraging trade negotiations to open up overseas markets while shrinking the debt/GDP and deficit/GDP ratios over the next 12 months. Otherwise, he risks a catastrophic loss in the mid-term congressional elections—which means his political opponents will be impeding him every step of the way in an effort to make that loss happen.

I had been expecting elevated volatility during H1 as the economy faced a gauntlet of challenges before surging to new highs in H2, but sanguine retail investors (with a healthy dose of FOMO) have been too eager to wait it out. Instead, they bought the April dip and never looked back, seemingly confident that my optimistic scenario would play out. And then the momentum-driven algos jumped in, followed by the institutional money. The Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF (SPHB) is up nearly 50% since the “Liberation Day” selloff, reflecting major risk-on behavior. Foreign capital is returning as well after a brief period of rebalancing, hedging, and “tariff paralysis.”

But, with lingering macro uncertainties and valuations seemingly “priced for perfection,” caution is warranted. Inflation and jobs metrics have been softening, in spite of what the headline numbers and MSM might suggest, as I discuss in greater depth in today’s post. The current inflation trend, as illustrated by the rolling 3-month annualized month-over-month (MoM) metrics rather than looking back 12 months to last year’s price index, shows Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) and Consumer Price Index (CPI) falling to just +1.08% and +1.01%, respectively. And regarding jobs growth, if you look under the hood of last week’s reports, private sector hiring has been quite weak, with the headline numbers bolstered by government hiring (at the state and local level, while federal jobs shrink) and government-supported sectors, like healthcare and education.

Of course, some of this reluctance to hire can be chalked up to the lack of clarity around trade deals, tariffs, inflation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and Fed policy, but much of this is clearing up. For example, now that the OBBBA has been signed into law, we know the new rules on tax rates, subsidies, and incentives. Moreover, the trade deals are gradually coming to fruition. However, the FOMC might continue to lay low in “watch and wait” mode to see how the economy and inflation respond rather than cut rates, which leaves Fed policy intentions murky.

I discuss both inflation and jobs in greater depth in my full commentary below, and I again make the case that the FOMC should have a terminal/neutral fed funds rate 100 bps lower than today’s 4.33% effective rate. Bond yields have normalized with the 10-year Treasury now around 4.40%, which is back to its levels last November to flatten the yield curve, and the 2-year is around 3.90%. Both rates are signaling to the FOMC they should cut, and in fact the Fed’s own long-run estimate for the fed funds rate is 3.0%. The market needs lower interest rates in tandem with business-friendly fiscal policy, including a 5.0% 30-year mortgage rate and a weaker dollar, to support US and global economies, to allow other central banks to inject liquidity, to avert global recession and credit crisis, and to relieve indebted consumers and businesses.

As Real Investment Advice has opined, “…if interest rates drop by just 1%, this could reduce [federal] spending by $500 billion annually, helping to ease fiscal pressures, [and] the coming strategic investments, workforce development, and sustainable energy policies could improve economic outcomes while resolving deficit concerns.” I agree.

So, I believe the Fed remains behind the curve as it worries about tariffs and phantom inflation—which the FOMC sees as a lurking boogeyman, like frightened children lying wide-eyed awake in their beds at night, expecting it to pounce at any moment. But as I continually pound the table on, tariffs are actually disinflationary (in the absence of a commensurate and offsetting increase in income). And more broadly, I believe inflation has resumed its 40-year (1980-2020) secular downtrend, as I discuss in my market commentary below.

Famed investor, co-founder of PIMCO, and “Bond King” Bill Gross argues that the growing federal deficit, elevated bond supply, and a weak dollar likely will keep inflation above 2.5% and create headwinds for bonds. However, while we both like US equities (even at today’s valuations, which I discuss in greater detail below), I see the outlook for bonds differently. Now that we have some clarity on the OBBBA and the debt ceiling, foreign investors and US consumers and businesses know much more about the rules they will be playing under.

Capital tends to flow to where it is most welcome and earns its highest returns, so I think the recent tide of foreign capital flight leaving the US will reverse, helping the dollar find a bottom and perhaps strengthen a bit, which based on historical correlations would suggest higher bond prices (lower yields, despite elevated issuance in the near term) and perhaps lower gold prices. However, without the de facto boost to global liquidity of a weakening dollar, the Fed will have to step up and provide that liquidity boost, such as by lowering interest rates and implementing “stealth QE” (such as through reduced bank reserve requirements) to encourage lending and boost velocity of money (M2V), which has recently stagnated.

Most any foreign investor will tell you there is no other place in the world to invest capital for the innovation and return on shareholder capital than the US, given our entrepreneurial culture, technological leadership in disruptive innovation, strong management and focus shareholder value, low interest-rate exposure, global scalability, wide protective moats, and our reliable and consistently strong earnings growth, free cash flow, margins, and return ratios, particularly among the dominant, cash flush. So, I continue to like US equities over international equities for the longer term (other than a simple mean-reversion trade).

Hindered by its quasi-socialist policies, Europe doesn’t come close to the US in producing game-changing technologies, opportunities, and prosperity for itself and the world at large. In my view, it lacks our level of freedom, openness, dynamism, and incentive structures. And as for China’s unique “capitalism with Chinese characteristics,” although its authoritarian rule, homogenous society, and obedient culture helps ensure broad unity and focus on common goals, its system is still far inferior when it comes to freedom of thought, entrepreneurship, and innovation, in my view. Despite America’s inequalities and inadequacies, there is no better country on earth for tolerance and opportunity for economic prosperity, and we continue to grow ever more diverse and inclusive—without government programs forcing it to be so.

Moreover, it’s not just the Technology sector that is appealing to investors. As BlackRock wrote in their Q2 2025 Equity Market Outlook, “Commentators will often cite the prevalence of a large number of Tech companies in the U.S. as the driver of U.S. equity dominance. But our analysis points to wider breadth in U.S. quality. Current return on tangible invested capital (ROTIC), a proxy for a company’s ability to allocate capital for optimal profitability, is significantly higher in the U.S. than elsewhere in the world, suggesting quality exists not in pockets but across sectors.”

Indeed, rather than investing in the passive cap-weighted indexes dominated by Big Tech, investors may be better served by active stock selection that seeks to identify under-the-radar, undervalued, high-quality gems. This is what Sabrient seeks to do in our various portfolios, all of which provide exposure to Value, Quality, Growth, and Size factors and to both secular and cyclical growth trends. When I say, “high-quality company,” I mean one that displays a history of consistent, reliable, resilient, durable, and accelerating sales, earnings, and free cash flow growth, rising profit margins, a history of meeting/beating estimates, high capital efficiency and ROI, solid earnings quality, a strong balance sheet, low debt burden, competitive advantage, and a reasonable valuation compared to its peers and its own history.

These are the factors Sabrient employs in selecting our Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Dividend, and Small Cap Growth portfolios, which are packaged and distributed as UITs by First Trust Portfolios. (By the way, the new Q3 Baker’s Dozen and Small Cap Growth portfolios are launching late next week, so these are the final several days to get into the Q2 portfolios launched in April—both of which are performing well versus their benchmarks so far.)

We also use many of those factors in our SectorCast ETF ranking model, and notably, our proprietary Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is a key factor used in each of our portfolios, and it is also licensed to the actively managed First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS) as a quality prescreen. In fact, we have launched our next-generation Sabrient Scorecards, which are powerful digital tools that rank stocks and ETFs using our proprietary factors. You can learn more about them by visiting:
http://HighPerformanceStockPortfolios.com.

In my full commentary below, I discuss in greater depth the trends in inflation, jobs, GDP, and stock valuations, as well as Sabrient’s latest fundamental-based SectorCast quantitative rankings of the ten U.S. business sectors, current positioning of our sector rotation model, and several top-ranked ETF ideas. Click HERE for a link to this post in printable PDF format.

By the way, my in-depth discussion of energy and electrical power generation (that I keep teasing) will be released soon. As always, please email me your thoughts on this article, and feel free to contact me about speaking on any of these topics at your event!  Read on….

  by Scott Martindale
  President, Sabrient Systems LLC

In case you didn’t notice, the past several days have brought an exciting and promising change in character in the US stock market. Capital has been rotating out of the investor darlings – including the momentum, growth, and low-volatility factors, as well as Treasury bonds and “bond proxy” defensive sectors – and into the neglected market segments like value, small-mid caps, and cyclical sectors favored by Sabrient’s GARP (growth at a reasonable price) model, many of which have languished with low valuations despite solid forward growth expectations. And it came just in the nick of time.

In Q3 of last year, the S&P 500 was hitting new highs and the financial press was claiming that investors were ignoring the trade war, when in fact they weren’t ignoring it at all, as evidenced by narrow leadership coming primarily from the mega-cap secular Technology names and large cap defensive sectors (risk-off). In reality, such market behavior was unhealthy and doomed to failure without a broadening into higher-beta cyclical sectors and small-mid caps, which is what I was opining about at the time. Of course, you know what happened, as Q4 brought about an ugly selloff. And this year, Q3 was looking much the same – at least until this sudden shift in investor preferences.

Last month, as has become expected given its typically low-volume summer trading, August saw increased volatility – and also brought out apocalyptic commentaries similar to what we heard from the talking heads in December. In contrast to the severely overbought technical conditions in July when the S&P 500 managed to make a new high, August saw the opposite, with the major indices becoming severely oversold and either challenging or losing support at their 200-day moving averages or even testing their May lows, as investors grew increasingly concerned about a protracted trade war, intensifying protectionist rhetoric, geopolitical turmoil, Hard Brexit, slowing global economy, and US corporate earnings recession. Utilities and Real Estate led, while Energy trailed. Bonds surged and yields plunged. August was the worst month for value stocks in over 20 years.

But alas, it appears it we may have seen a blow-off top in bonds, and Treasury yields may have put in a bottom. All of a sudden, the major topic of conversation among the talking heads this week has been the dramatic rotation from risk-off market segments to risk-on, which has been a boon for Sabrient’s Baker’s Dozen portfolios, giving them the opportunity to gain a lot of ground versus the S&P 500 benchmark. The Energy sector had been a persistent laggard, but the shorts have been covering as oil prices have firmed up. Financials have caught a bid as US Treasury prices have fallen (and yields have risen). Small cap value has been greatly outperforming large cap growth. It seems investors are suddenly less worried about a 2020 recession, ostensibly due to renewed optimism about trade talks, or perhaps due to the apparent resilience of our economy to weather the storm.

The question, though, is whether this is just a temporary reversion to the mean – aka a “junk rally,” as some have postulated – or if it is the start of a healthy broadening in the market and a rotation from the larger, high-quality but high-priced stocks (which have been bid up by overly cautious sentiment, passive index investing, and algorithmic trading, in my view), into the promising earnings growers, cyclicals, and good-quality mid and small caps that would normally lead a rising market. After all, despite its strong year-to-date performance, the S&P 500 really hasn’t progressed much at all from last September’s high. But a real breakout finally may be in store if this risk-on rotation can continue.

I think the market is at a critical turning point. We may be seeing a tacit acknowledgment among investors that perhaps the economy is likely to hold up despite the trade war. And perhaps mega-caps with a lot of international exposure are no longer the best place to invest. And perhaps those mega-caps, along with the defensive sectors that have been leading the market for so long, are largely bid up and played out at this point such that the more attractive opportunities now lie in the unjustly neglected areas – many of which still trade at single-digit forward P/Es despite solid growth expectations.

September is historically a bad month for stocks. It is the only month in which the Dow Jones Industrials index has averaged negative performance over the past 100 years, showing positive returns about 40% of the time (according to Bespoke Investment Group). But this budding rotation may be setting up a more positive outcome. I was on the verge of publishing this month’s article early last week, but the market’s sudden (and important!) change in character led me to hold off for a few days to see how the action unfolded, and I have taken a new tack on my content.

In this periodic update, I provide a detailed market commentary, offer my technical analysis of the S&P 500, review Sabrient’s latest fundamentals based SectorCast rankings of the ten US business sectors, and serve up some actionable ETF trading ideas. In summary, our sector rankings look defensive to me, while the technical picture is short-term overbought but longer-term bullish, and the sector rotation model takes to a solidly bullish posture. Read on…

by Scott Martindale
President, Sabrient Systems LLC

Many market commentators have been in a prolonged tizzy, warning of an inevitable selloff to come. And indeed we finally got one, with a huge spike in volatility. A climate of low inflation and structurally low interest rates has meant less discounting of future corporate earnings, which has allowed for higher enterprise values and stock prices. But when inflation fears suddenly popped up, investors feared an imminent repricing of equities at lower multiples. As I wrote at the start of the year, I expected some renewed volatility and compression in valuation multiples to occur during 2018, but I sure didn’t expect it to happen quite so soon. However, I also said that a correction would be healthy, and that it won’t necessarily be as deep of a selloff as so many investors have feared – and I stand by that prediction.

So, what is going on here? I think there were a few catalysts. First, the dollar has been plummeting on inflation worries, chasing away global fixed income investors and spiking yields, which put elevated equity valuations into question. Second, a healthy technical correction from January’s parabolic uptrend in stock prices spiked volatility to such a degree that the inverse VIX ETF/ETNs imploded, revealing structural problems with some of these products that not only spooked institutional investors but also triggered some abrupt changes to tactical equity exposures in their algorithmic trading models. And then we heard some FOMC members making statements implying that perhaps there is no longer a “Fed Put” supporting the market. It’s no wonder the long-expected correction finally (and quite suddenly) came about.

Given that the price chart had gone parabolic, it shouldn’t be too much of a surprise that volatility raised its ugly head, with the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) briefly spiking above 50, much like an overstretched rubber band snaps back, and with sector correlations rising sharply. Nevertheless, I still expect solidly positive performance in the broad market indices by year end, although significantly lower than last year’s +22% performance on the S&P 500, and perhaps only in the high single digits. I also believe that heightened volatility and some compression in the broad market valuation multiples will lead to greater market breadth and lower sector correlations as investors pick their spots outside of the mega-caps (or passive index investing) and seek out higher returns in stocks that display strong growth prospects at a reasonable price (i.e., GARP) – with realistic potential for gains in the 15-25% range (or even higher).

In this periodic update, I provide a market commentary, offer my technical analysis of the S&P 500, review Sabrient’s latest fundamentals-based SectorCast rankings of the ten US business sectors, and serve up some actionable ETF trading ideas. In summary, our sector rankings still look bullish, while the sector rotation model moved to a neutral bias in response to the market turbulence. Read on....

by Scott Martindale
President, Sabrient Systems LLC

The S&P 500 finished 2017 by completing an unusual feat. Not only was the index up +22% (total return), but every single month of the year saw positive performance on a total return basis, and in fact, the index is on a 14-month winning streak (Note: the previous record of 15 straight was set back in 1959!). So, as you might expect, volatility was historically low all year, with the VIX displaying an average daily closing value of 11 (versus a “fear threshold” of 15 and a “panic threshold” of 20). But some of 2017’s strength was due to expansion in valuation multiples in anticipation of tax reform and lower effective tax rates boosting existing earnings, not to mention incentives for repatriating overseas cash balances, expansion, and capex.

Sector correlations also remained low all year, while performance dispersion remained high, both of which are indications of a healthy market, as investors focus on fundamentals and pick their spots for investing – rather than just trade risk-on/risk-off based on the daily news headlines and focus on a narrow group of mega-cap technology firms (like 2015), or stay defensive (like 1H2016). And Sabrient’s fundamentals-based portfolios have thrived in this environment.

Now that the biggest tax overhaul in over 30 years is a reality, investors may do some waiting-and-watching regarding business behavior under the new rules and the impact on earnings, and there may be some normalization in valuation multiples. In other words, we may not see 20% gains in the S&P 500 during 2018, but I still expect a solidly positive year, albeit with some elevated volatility.

In this periodic update, I provide a market outlook, conduct a technical analysis of the S&P 500 chart, review Sabrient’s latest fundamentals-based SectorCast rankings of the ten US business sectors, and offer up some actionable ETF trading ideas. In summary, our sector rankings still look bullish, while the sector rotation model also maintains its bullish bias. Read on....