by Scott Martindale
  CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

Quick note: Sabrient’s annual Forward Looking Value 14 portfolio just launched last week on 8/26 with a diverse mix of 31 stocks across 9 business sectors and a 50/50 Large/SMID-cap mix. Think of it as a less-concentrated and more value-oriented version of Baker’s Dozen. Last year’s FLV 13 terminates 11/17 and is up +38.4% vs. +19.4% for S&P 500 Value (SPYV) and +20.2% for S&P 500 (SPY) as of 9/2. I personally like the UIT structure as a diversifier for a client’s equity portfolio because they are unmanaged—while most other products are managed to some extent, even quarterly rebalanced rules-based indexes—and most active managers tend to underperform their benchmarks. Also, value stocks tend not to be as volatile, so value or dividend portfolios tend to fit well with the unmanaged, buy-and-hold-for-15-months structure.

Overview:

The US economy is changing faster than the traditional macro indicators can explain it. On the one hand, Q2 GDP (just +1.5%) and jobs growth look sluggish, inflation is sticky, debt and bond yields are surging, and the bifurcated “K-shaped” economy is causing poor consumer sentiment and public dissatisfaction—to the point that socialism(!) is gaining traction. The top 10% by net worth own 87% of stocks and 68% of total net worth, while the bottom 50% own just 1% of stocks but carry 52% of consumer debt. Consumer debt is rising while the personal savings rate remains low to support spending. Real (inflation-adjusted) consumer spending was essentially flat in July, while the personal savings rate finally edged up slightly to 3.0% in July after a steady decline from 6.4% in January 2024 to as low as 2.6% in June 2026.

On the other hand, the official Q2 GDP reading was held down by high AI-related imports and inventory drawdowns, which actually reflect robust economic activity. Private domestic demand (considered a truer signal of underlying economic health) was quite strong in Q2 at +4.2% annualized rate, consumer spending was up +3.4%, business investment excluding housing was up +8.5%. Indeed, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow now forecasts Q3 GDP at 4.7% (as of 9/3). Corporate profits, productivity, margins, cash flow, and capex are massive. Jobless claims in our “low-hire, low-fire” labor market are near their lowest level in decades, which Fed chairman Kevin Warsh calls "an empirically robust real-time indicator” constrained only by flattening labor supply (a lack of willing workers).

Perhaps the low personal savings rate is to be expected as Baby Boomers retire and draw down their wealth, and household debt as a percentage of disposable personal income has stopped rising in Q1-Q2. Stocks are near all-time highs even though interest rates have become punitive (compared to what the broad economy had become accustomed to), and market breadth is improving.

While these data points might seem like contradictions, they may in fact be a predictable reflection of a structural transition toward a more capital-intensive, AI-driven, productivity-led economy.

Regarding inflation and Fed policy, Warsh stated in his Jackson Hole speech, “Certain sectors—like housing and agriculture—are showing strains. But, on balance, I would be hard pressed to describe broad financial conditions as restrictive…. We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed. Otherwise, we have work to do.” But you likely heard it paraphrased as simply, “Inflation is running too hot…financial conditions are not restrictive…we have work to do,” which is clearly more hawkish than his actual statement and seemingly a fait accompli that rate hikes are imminent. Fed funds futures now imply 2+ rate hikes over the next 12 months, with 50% odds of a 25-bp hike at the upcoming FOMC meeting this month.
 
However, I humbly disagree. I think Warsh’s actual statement cleverly balanced between sounding sufficiently hawkish to appease the “bond vigilantes” while leaving himself an opening to avoid hiking rates. Most of the non-supply-shock components of inflation are relatively subdued, and by some key metrics, underlying inflation is indeed moving toward the 2% objective—for example, Warsh’s preferred Trimmed Mean PCE has held steady at +2.3% in June/July, and the real-time, blockchain-based Truflation CPI is also +2.3% (as of 9/3). Meanwhile, all is not well in this K-shaped economy. The labor market is stagnant, the lower/working class consumer and wage earner is struggling, and monetary policy is clearly restrictive in the most rate-sensitive industries and demographics.

We can’t continue to rely solely on massive AI capex and retiring Baby-Boomer spending (neither of which are particularly rate sensitive) to power our economy while watching the lower leg of the K languish. All it takes is for one hyperscaler to announce a significant reduction in capex and we’ll likely see economic growth fall—along with the stock market.

So, I continue to believe a rate cut is appropriate—certainly not a hike (as fed funds futures and Polymarket confidently predict). A hike would only further hinder those struggling cash-poor segments (many of whom are warming up to the socialist “free stuff” rhetoric) while doing little to restrain the cash-rich AI trade or resolve the event-driven supply shock. I feel alone in the woods on this, but I see the neutral rate at 3.0-3.25%. Unfortunately, such an action apparently would be quite unpopular in the bond market and thus is unlikely to happen anytime soon, thus keeping the economy bifurcated. However, in speeches this week, Fed governor Christopher Waller and NY Fed president John Williams pumped the brakes on the tightening narrative (“Give disinflation a chance”).

Kevin Warsh has suggested in the past a preference for fulfilling his mandate of price stability through a combination of: 1) a lower fed funds rate, 2) continued balance sheet reduction to constrain money supply growth (including a revised Treasury-Fed relationship that gives the Treasury more say over balance-sheet decisions), and 3) structural reform of how inflation is measured (replacing the lagged and imputed components). This approach would ensure that liquidity is cheaper to access, preventing credit markets from locking up without flooding the entire financial system with inflationary liquidity. Less Fed demand for bonds might steepen the yield curve somewhat and keep 30-year mortgage rates elevated, but a lower fed funds rate reduces rates on short-term construction loans and adjustable mortgages.

According to global liquidity expert Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital, the “Fed does not need to cut Fed funds to loosen US monetary conditions. It can hold the policy rate steady while Treasury bill issuance, reserve management and bank balance-sheet expansion deliver the liquidity impulse. This is the essence of ‘Treasury QE’: fiscal expansion financed at the short end, supported by enough reserve liquidity to keep funding markets orderly.”

By the way, regarding the sudden tariff flare-up with Canada, our neighbor’s retaliation could have targeted industrial inputs but instead it’s notable that they only apply to food and consumer products in an (admittedly) targeted effort to pressure Republican candidates in competitive US midterm election races in swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and red states like Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky.

In my full commentary below, I discuss:

1. Broadening continues as small caps, value, and the S&P 493 carry the baton
2. High earnings vs. high yields and the impact on valuations
3. The NVIDIA juggernaut and AI Phase II: proving the economy-wide ROI
4. Materials and power constraints on the AI buildout
5. K-shaped economy, inflation, and the Fed’s policy dilemma
6. Runaway Federal debt and the need to grow our way out of it
7. Crude oil inventory drawdown and oil company windfall profits
8. My Final Comments essay: Is AI opposition a nuclear power redux?
9. Sabrient’s sector rankings, positioning of our sector rotation model, and some top-ranked ETF ideas

According to Morgan Stanley, AI’s diffusion across the global economy is a $40 trillion opportunity that will rely on affordable compute. Indeed, there is so much demand for compute, some say it is becoming a new asset class—like stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate, private credit, crypto, collectibles, royalties, cash-flowing private businesses, or carbon credits. Pending regulatory review, CME Group and Silicon Data have announced plans to launch futures contracts on compute by tracking daily and hourly on-demand GPU rental cost indexes for NVIDIA's H100 and next-gen Blackwell B200 chips. This allows a company reliant on AI to lock in a future price and ensure delivery from a new datacenter that takes 2-3 years to build.

Some are worried about falling token prices hurting the projected ROI on capex. But at the Google I/O 2026 Conference, CEO Sundar Pichai said that AI is using 3.2 quadrillion tokens per month, which is up 7x YoY. Indeed, rapidly falling inference costs can create demand that didn’t exist at previous prices. This is largely due to Jevons Paradox, which says efficiency gains lower production cost, which gets passed on to customers, thus driving up demand, which increases total resource usage over time—i.e., demand for a product or resource rises as price falls (aka demand elasticity). So, if the hyperscaler can produce and sell compute tokens cheaper, usage surges, and the hyperscaler makes more money overall. It seems this trend can only be disrupted by misguided (or deliberately subversive) politicians hell-bent on obstructing this broad, multi-layered, truly all-in, capital-investment cycle, as I discuss further in my Final Comments essay below.

This is just one of the many reasons I expect to see, through the end of this decade and likely beyond, smaller government and less low-ROI government spending in favor of more high-ROI capital allocation from an unleashed private sector as the primary engine of organic economic growth through fiscal support like favorable tax policy, deregulation, and other supply-side incentives for reshoring/onshoring to increase productive capacity.

As such, I still think the S&P 500 could reach 8,000 by year end. However, I also think a further market pullback this month is likely, perhaps to test support at the 50-day moving average, and as a reminder, September is the only month since 1975 in which the S&P 500 has averaged a net loss (-0.8%). But assuming continued healthy market broadening beyond the Big Tech titans, and praying the Fed does not start tightening, I continue to see opportunities in active stock selection, equal-weight indexes, value stocks, cyclical sectors, small caps, and bond-alternative dividend payers. I also continue to believe the Healthcare sector, which finally came alive this year, offers tremendous growth opportunities as it leverages AI. Sector earnings for Healthcare Select SPDR (XLV) are projected to rise by 22% YoY in 2027, which is second only to Technology.

Sabrient’s quant-based, actively selected (“quantamental”) Baker’s Dozen, Forward Looking Value, Dividend, and Small Cap Growth portfolios have been largely outperforming their benchmarks—several by substantial margins. And as a reminder, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is licensed as a quality prescreen to the actively managed, low-beta First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS), which now has more than $2.5 billion in AUM.

Here is a link to this full post in printable PDF format. As always, I’d love to hear from you! Please feel free to email me your thoughts on this article or if you’d like me to speak on any of these topics at your event.  Read on….

  by Scott Martindale
  President & CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

Overview:

Strong US stock market performance has been driven, in my view, by the combination of: 1) a dovish Fed, money supply growth and global capital flight to the US (“shadow liquidity”), 2) expectations of lower energy costs and falling inflation, 3) AI exuberance and capex and the promise of massive productivity gains, and 4) growing optimism about technologies like nuclear energy, blockchain, quantum computing, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and genomics. But after two consecutive years of 20%+ gains in the S&P 500 for the first time since 1998 (and even greater gains for the Tech-dominated Nasdaq 100)—greatly outperforming all prominent forecasts—investors are looking ahead to a year that arguably brings even greater uncertainty and a wider range of expected outcomes, ranging from a recession and bear market to a continued bull run within a Roaring ‘20s-redux decade.

Will Trump 2.0 business-friendly fiscal policies (e.g., tax cuts, deregulation) and DOGE cost-cutting impact the economy, inflation, federal budget deficit, and corporate profits negatively for a period of time before kicking in later? What about sluggish economic growth abroad and the disastrous impacts of the ultra-strong dollar, particularly among key trading partners like Canada, Mexico, Europe, China, and Japan? And will the massive corporate capex (which is expected to accelerate under the new administration’s policies) start to show commensurate returns in the form of rising productivity and profitability, leading to rising GDP growth (in true supply-side style) without the crutch of government deficit spending (which accounted for about 30% of growth over the last 4 quarters)…and ultimately to rising tax receipts to quickly offset any initial rise in the deficit?

The bull case sees an economy and stock market driven by business-friendly fiscal policies under Trump 2.0 including deregulation, lower corporate tax rate, and restoration of civil liberties and constitutional freedoms should also be stimulative and might fuel disinflation (as opposed to the inflation that many critics expect). Trump’s energy policies are also likely to be disinflationary. Capital flight into the US (most of which stays outside our banking system and therefore is not captured by M2), huge corporate capex, less deficit spending (and politburo-style “malinvestment” and mandates), and strong productivity growth, and rising velocity of money that offsets any tightening in money supply growth.

According to Capital Group, a mid-cycle economy typically displays rising corporate profits, accelerating credit demand, modest inflationary pressures, and a move toward neutral monetary policy—all of which occurred during 2024. And besides expectations of a highly aggressive 15% earnings growth in the S&P 500 over the next couple of years, Silicon Valley VC Shervin Pishevar recently opined, “I think there’s going to be a renaissance of innovation in America…It’s going to be exciting to see… AI is going to accelerate so fast we’re going to reach AGI [Artificial General Intelligence, or human-like thinking] within the next 2-3 years. I think there will be ‘Manhattan Projects’ for AI, quantum computing, biotech.” So, it all sounds quite good.

However, my observation is that GDP and jobs growth have been highly reliant on huge government deficit spending bills, which is not so good. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model forecasts Q4 GDP to come in at just 2.7%, which is sluggish growth considering the huge amount of government money and corporate capex being spent. Rising bond yields and strengthening US dollar means less liquidity and tighter financial conditions, which are negatives for risk assets. The incoming administration—free this time of the unknowing appointment of deep-state obstructionists like in his first term—is suggesting a new tack characterized by smaller government and the unleashing of animal spirits in the private sector, with the goal of achieving GDP growth north of 4%.

So, for 2025, I expect strong fiscal and monetary policy support for economic growth (albeit with some pains and stumbles along the way as government spending is reined in) as well as moderating inflation as shelter costs recede, military conflicts are resolved (war is inflationary), and deflationary impulses arrive from struggling economies in China and Europe. I also expect stocks and bonds will both attain modest gains by year end (albeit with elevated volatility along the way). In this transitional year in which a more politically seasoned Donald Trump’s policies and leadership have gained broader support domestically across demographics (and indeed across the world), how it all gets off the ground and how quickly it generates traction this year will have profound implications for the rest of his term and beyond. Heck, even a growing contingent in ultra-blue California have become willing to give his approach a chance—further red-pilled by the disastrous LA wildfires (more on this below).

To me, the biggest question marks for our economy and stocks in 2025 (other than a Black Swan event) are: 1) the net impacts of Trump’s cost cutting efforts (on federal deficit spending and boondoggles) balanced with his pro-business policies and a supportive Fed, and 2) the impacts of economic growth struggles abroad. China is dealing with deflation (PPI has declined for 26 months in a row), a real estate crisis, weak retail sales, and surging excess savings among a shrinking population. Since the Global Financial Crisis, China’s marginal returns on capital have plunged from around 14% to barely 5% (on par with the US). As for the Eurozone, its share of world GDP has fallen from a high of 26.4% in 1992 to just 14.8% in 202, as its obsession with renewable electricity (rather than fossil fuels and nuclear) costing 5x the price of conventionally produced electricity—and driving low returns on capital and thus capital flight. As MacroStrategy Partners UK has opined, “With all of GDP [essentially] an energy conversion, our future depends on either extending fossil fuel production further or developing nuclear.”

Indeed, the US remains the beacon of hope for global investors. However, at the moment, surging bond yields, weak market internals, and a strengthening dollar suggest investors have grown cautious. All the major stock and bond indexes fell below their 50-day simple moving averages (although they are trying to regain them today, 1/15). Inflation hedges gold and bitcoin have risen back above theirs, but all these asset classes have lost both their momentum in concert with sluggish global liquidity growth since October (as pointed out by economist and liquidity guru Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital). Of course, rising real yields tend to reduce the appeal of gold, and nominal yields have been rising much faster than the modest (and likely temporary) uptick in inflation.

Indeed, the latest PPI and CPI readings this week show stabilization, which the markets cheered (across all asset classes). As I write, the 10-year Treasury yield has fallen below 4.70% and the 20-year dropped below the important 5% handle. Hopefully, this will stem the rise in 30-year mortgage rates, which are above 7.0%, creating a big impediment to the critical housing market. The delinquency rate on commercial office MBS jumped to a record 11% in December, which is the highest since the Global Financial Crisis. Consumer credit card defaults jumped to a 14-year high as average cc interest rates hit a record high, now in excess of 23%. And then we have our federal government needing to roll over at least $16 trillion (of our $36.2 trillion debt) during the next four years.

Although Michael Howell thinks the 10-year Treasury yield could continue to rise to perhaps 5.5%, which would be a huge definite negative for risk assets, my view is that bond prices will soon find support (and stabilize yields), which would help stocks stabilize as well. After all, US Treasury yields are attractive in that they are among the highest among developed markets, and the two largest economies are diverging, with China’s yields collapsing (10-year below 1.7%) as US yields surged. Indeed, debt deflation and sluggish economic conditions in China are at risk of creating a deflationary spiral. Also, the traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio rebalancing is taking place, which shifts capital from equities to bonds.

If I am right and the bottom in 20-year Treasury price (i.e., peak yield) is nigh (as it retests its low from April 2024), we likely would see the dollar decline, gold rally, and bond yields fall, which would be a tailwind for growth stocks. Ultimately, I expect the terminal fed funds rate will be around 3.50% (from today’s 4.25-4.50%), although it might not get there until 2026, and I think the 10-year will gradually settle back to around 4.25%.

Assuming AI and blockchain capital spending and productivity gains are already largely priced into the lofty Big Tech valuations, perhaps this is the year that the market finally broadens in earnest such that opportunities can be found among small caps, bonds and dividend paying stocks, value, and cyclical sectors like Financials, Industrials, and Transports (and perhaps segments of Energy, like natural gas production, liquefication, and transport), However, the Basic Materials sector, particularly industrial commodities (like copper), may struggle with weak Chinese demand, and because many commodities are priced in dollars, a strong dollar reduces purchasing power among all our trading partners, which further hinders demand. As such, Materials continues to rank at the bottom of Sabrient’s SectorCast rankings.

I go into all of this (and more, including my outlook for 2025) in my full post below. Overall, my suggestion to investors remains this. Don’t chase the highflyers and instead focus on high-quality businesses at reasonable prices, hold inflation and dollar hedges like gold and bitcoin, expect elevated volatility given the uncertainty of the new administration’s policies and impact, and be prepared to exploit any market pullbacks by accumulating those high-quality stocks in anticipation of gains by year end and beyond, fueled by massive capex in blockchain and AI applications, infrastructure, and energy, leading to rising productivity, increased productive capacity (“duplicative excess capacity,” in the words of Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent, would be disinflationary), and economic expansion.

When I say, “high-quality company,” I mean one that is fundamentally strong by displaying a history of consistent, reliable, and accelerating sales and earnings growth, positive revisions to Wall Street analysts’ consensus forward estimates, rising profit margins and free cash flow, solid earnings quality, and low debt burden. These are the factors Sabrient employs in selecting our portfolios. We also use many of those factors in our SectorCast ETF ranking model. And notably, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is a key factor in each of these models, and it is also licensed to the actively managed, absolute-return-oriented First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS).

Sabrient founder David Brown describes these (and other) factors and his portfolio construction process in his new book, How to Build High Performance Stock Portfolios, which is available on Amazon for investors of all experience levels. David describes his path from NASA engineer on the Apollo 11 moon landing project to creating quant models for ranking stocks and building stock portfolios in 4 distinct investing styles—growth, value, dividend, or small cap growth. To learn more about David's book and the companion subscription product we offer that does most of the stock evaluation work for you, visit: https://DavidBrownInvestingBook.com

As a reminder, our research team at Sabrient leverages a process-driven, quantitative methodology to build predictive multifactor models, data sets, stock and ETF rankings, rules-based equity indexes, and thematic stock portfolios. As you might expect from former engineers, we use the scientific method and hypothesis-testing to build models that make sense—and we do that for growth, value, dividend, and small cap strategies. We have become best known for our “Baker’s Dozen” growth portfolio of 13 diverse picks, which is packaged and distributed quarterly to the financial advisor community as a unit investment trust, along with 3 other offshoot strategies for value, dividend, and small cap investing.

In fact, the Q1 2025 Baker’s Dozen will launch this Friday 1/17, followed by Small Cap Growth on 1/22 and then Dividend on 2/11.

Lastly, let me make a brief comment on the LA wildfires. It seems every wildfire in SoCal has always ended when “we got lucky,” as the fire chiefs and local meteorologists would say, due to the winds tapering off and/or rains arriving just in time. I certainly saw this firsthand a few times during my 20 years raising a family in Santa Barbara. And I always wondered, what will happen when this “luck” doesn’t materialize the next time? Of course, even if one believes that reversing climate change is humanly possible, the lengthy timetable to decarbonization (while countries like China and India continue to increase carbon emissions by burning coal at record amounts to generate 60% and 70% of their electricity, respectively) means that proper preparation today for disasters is essential. And yet California’s leadership was doing the opposite, prioritizing specious social justice agendas while degrading readiness for the “perfect storm” of wildfire conditions…when luck fails to arrive. My deepest sympathies, thoughts, and prayers go out to all those impacted by this preventable tragedy.

Click HERE to continue reading my full commentary online or to sign up for email delivery of this monthly market letter. Also, here is a link to this post in printable PDF format. I invite you to share it as appropriate (to the extent your compliance allows).

  by Scott Martindale
  President & CEO, Sabrient Systems LLC

It would be an understatement to say that last week was particularly eventful, what with the elections and FOMC policy decision, plus some impressive earnings announcements. Election Day is finally behind us, and the results sent investors into a fit of stock market FOMO—in one of the greatest post-election rallies ever—while dumping their bonds. Much like the day after President Trump’s win in 2016, the leading sectors were cyclicals: Industrials, Energy, Financials. And then on Fed Day, markets got their locked-in 25-bp rate cut, and the rally kept going across all risk assets, including strengthening the US dollar on the expectation of accelerating capital flight into the US as Trump’s policies, particularly with support from a Republican-led congress, should be quite business-friendly, with lower tax rates and red tape and much less focus on anti-trust lawfare.

So, there was a lot for investors to absorb last week, and this week brings the October CPI and PPI reports. Indeed, the whole world has been pining for clarity from the US—and they got it. And I’m sure no one misses the barrage of political ads and bitter electioneering. Hopefully, it marks the peak in election divisiveness our society will ever see again. Notably, inflation hedges gold and bitcoin have suddenly diverged, with gold pulling back from its all-time high while bitcoin—which can be considered both a dollar hedge and a risk asset for its utility—has continued its surge to new highs (now over $85k as I write!) on the added optimism around Trump’s crypto-friendly stance.

Besides expectations of a highly aggressive 15% earnings growth in the S&P 500 over the next couple of years, venture capital could be entering a boom following four years of difficulty in raising capital. In an interview with Yahoo Finance, Silicon Valley VC Shervin Pishevar opined, “I think there’s going to be a renaissance of innovation in America…It’s going to be exciting to see… AI is going to accelerate so fast we’re going to reach AGI [Artificial General Intelligence, or human-like thinking] within the next 2-3 years. I think there will be ‘Manhattan Projects’ for AI, quantum computing, biotech.”

It all sounds quite appealing, but there’s always a Wall of Worry for investors, and the worry now is whether Trump’s pro-growth policies like reducing tax rates, deregulation, rooting out government waste and inefficiency (i.e., “drain the swamp”) combined with his more controversial intentions like tariffs, mass deportations of cheap migrant labor, and threats to Big Pharma, the food industry, and key trading partners (including Mexico)—in concert with a dovish Fed—will create a resurgence in inflation and unemployment and push the federal debt and budget deficit to new heights before the economy is ready to stand on its own—i.e., without the massive federal deficit spending and hiring we saw under Biden—thus creating a period of stagflation and perhaps a credit crisis. Rising interest rates and a stronger dollar are creating tighter financial conditions and what Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital calls “a fast-approaching debt maturity wall” that adds to his concerns that 2025 might prove tougher for investors if the Global Liquidity cycle peaks and starts to decline.

But in my view, the end goals of shrinking the size and scope of our federal government and restoring a free, private-sector-driven economy are worthy, and we can weather any short-term pain along the way and perhaps fend off that looming “debt maturity wall.” Nevertheless, given the current speculative fervor (“animal spirits”) and multiple expansion in the face of surging bond yields (i.e., the risk-free discount rate on earnings streams), it might be time to exercise some caution and perhaps put on some downside hedges. Remember the old adage, “Stocks take the stairs up and the elevator down” (be sure to read my recent post with 55 timeless investing proverbs to live by).

In any case, at the moment, I believe the stock market has gotten a bit ahead of itself with frothy valuations and extremely overbought technical conditions (with the major indexes at more than two standard deviations above their 50-day moving averages). But I think any significant pullback or technical consolidation to allow the moving averages to catch up would be a buying opportunity into year-end and through 2025, and perhaps well into 2026—assuming the new administration’s policies go according to plan. As DataTrek Research pointed out, there is plenty of dry powder to buy stocks as cash balances are high (an average of 19.2% of institutional portfolios vs.10-15% during the bull market of the 2010’s).

This presumes that the proverbial “Fed Put” is indeed back in play. Also, I continue to believe that rate normalization means the FOMC ultimately taking the fed funds rate down to a terminal rate of about 3.0-3.5%—although I’m now leaning toward the higher side of that range as new fiscal policy from the “red wave” recharges private-sector growth (so that GDP and jobs are no longer reliant on government deficit spending and hiring) and potentially reignites some inflationary pressures.

This is not necessarily a bad thing. Although inflation combined with stagnant growth creates the dreaded “stagflation,” moderate inflation with robust growth (again, driven by the private sector rather than the government) can be healthy for the economy, business, and workers while also helping to “inflate away” our massive debt. Already, although supply chain pressures remain low, inflation has perked up a bit recently, likely due to rising global liquidity and government spending, as I discuss in detail in today’s post.

So, my suggestions remain: Buy high-quality businesses at reasonable prices, hold inflation hedges like gold and bitcoin, and be prepared to exploit any market correction—both as stocks sell off (such as by buying out-of-the-money put options, while VIX is low) and as they begin to rebound (by buying stocks and options when share prices are down). A high-quality company is one that is fundamentally strong (across any market cap) in that it displays consistent, reliable, and accelerating sales and earnings growth, positive revisions to Wall Street analysts’ consensus estimates, rising profit margins and free cash flow, solid earnings quality, and low debt burden. These are the factors Sabrient employs in selecting the growth-oriented Baker’s Dozen (our “Top 13” stocks), the value-oriented Forward Looking Value, the growth & income-oriented Dividend portfolio, and Small Cap Growth. We also use many of those factors in our SectorCast ETF ranking model. And notably, our Earnings Quality Rank (EQR) is a key factor in each of these models, and it is also licensed to the actively managed, absolute-return-oriented First Trust Long-Short ETF (FTLS).

Each of our key alpha factors and their usage within Sabrient’s Growth, Value, Dividend, and Small Cap investing strategies (which underly those aforementioned portfolios) is discussed in detail in Sabrient founder David Brown’s new book, How to Build High Performance Stock Portfolios, which is now available to buy in both paperback and eBook formats on Amazon.com.

And in conjunction with David’s new book, we are also offering a subscription to our next-generation Sabrient Scorecard for Stocks, which is a downloadable spreadsheet displaying our Top 30 highest-ranked stock picks for each of those 4 investing strategies. And as a bonus, we also provide our Scorecard for ETFs that scores and ranks roughly 1,400 US-listed equity ETFs. Both Scorecards are posted weekly in Excel format and allow you to see how your stocks and ETFs rank in our system…or for identifying the top-ranked stocks and ETFs (or for weighted combinations of our alpha factors). You can learn more about both the book and the next-gen Scorecards (and download a free sample scorecard) at http://DavidBrownInvestingBook.com.

In today’s post, I dissect in greater detail GDP, jobs, federal debt, inflation, corporate earnings, stock valuations, technological trends, and what might lie ahead for the stock market with the incoming administration. I also discuss Sabrient’s latest fundamental-based SectorCast quantitative rankings of the ten U.S. business sectors, current positioning of our sector rotation model, and several top-ranked ETF ideas. And be sure to check out my Final Thoughts section in which I offer my post-mortem on the election.

Click HERE to continue reading my full commentary or to sign up for email delivery of this monthly market letter. Also, here is a link to this post in printable PDF format. I invite you to share it as appropriate (to the extent your compliance allows).